Explain SMBC — the wiki for Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal

art-2

2019-01-16 View on smbc-comics.com → 1 revision
You are viewing an older revision of this explanation (2026-03-14 19:09:37). View current version →
art-2
Votey panel for art-2
This explanation is incomplete or may contain errors. It was generated by AI and has not yet been reviewed by a human editor.

Explanation

The Joke

The comic opens with someone asking "Can video games be art?" Another character redirects: "Let me ask you a different question. Can video games be zinkvoodnik?" When the first person asks what "zinkvoodnik" means, the response is that it is a "term of such vague, loose, ill-defined parameters, which can be used to describe literally anything given the proper context." The first person realizes the parallel — "Oh, you're saying that 'art' is just as meaningless a category?" But then comes the final twist: "But am I a zinkvoodnik?" — showing that the characters have now gotten completely lost in the meta-question and forgotten the original debate entirely.

The comic attacks the "are video games art?" debate not by taking a side, but by arguing that the word "art" is so poorly defined that the question itself is meaningless. If you cannot clearly define what "art" means, then asking whether something qualifies as art is no more meaningful than asking whether it qualifies as a made-up nonsense word.

The Humor

The humor comes from the elegant philosophical trap. By inventing the word "zinkvoodnik" and giving it the same fuzzy, all-encompassing definition that "art" effectively has, the comic exposes how vacuous the debate really is. The final panel, where a character earnestly asks "But am I a zinkvoodnik?", shows how these definitional rabbit holes lead to absurd existential questions — exactly mirroring how the "is X art?" debate often spirals into pretentious territory. Weiner is poking fun at a debate that has consumed enormous cultural energy while resting on a term nobody can actually pin down.

References

The question "Can video games be art?" has been a recurring cultural debate, most famously stoked by film critic Roger Ebert, who argued in 2010 that video games could never be art, sparking widespread discussion. The comic engages with broader philosophical questions about the definition of art that trace back to aesthetics debates from Plato through Wittgenstein's concept of "family resemblance" terms — categories that resist precise definition.

View History (1) Original Comic