Explain SMBC — the wiki for Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal

backdoors

2016-04-17 View on smbc-comics.com → 1 revision
backdoors
Votey panel for backdoors
This explanation is incomplete or may contain errors. It was generated by AI and has not yet been reviewed by a human editor.

Explanation

The Joke

A person says they do not see why the government needs a backdoor to all software. A government official says "You make it sound so sinister" and offers an analogy: "You're wearing clothes. That's fine. But how do we know you're not hiding something in there?" The official continues: "We don't want you to go without clothes, so we offer a simple compromise -- we make it so that all of your clothes are see-through all the time, but only for a small group of distant people whose identities and motives are secret to you." The citizen responds: "That analogy just makes it seem worse." The official simply replies: "Analogy!" -- as if merely invoking the word is sufficient to make the argument work.

The Humor

The comic satirizes government arguments for encryption backdoors by having a government official attempt to use an analogy that backfires spectacularly. The intended analogy is supposed to make surveillance sound reasonable, but when translated from the abstract world of software encryption to the physical world of clothing and bodies, the invasiveness becomes glaringly obvious. Making all clothes see-through for a secret group of people is clearly creepy and dystopian, which is exactly the point -- the same logic applied to software backdoors is equally invasive, just less viscerally apparent. The final panel's one-word response ("Analogy!") mocks the rhetorical tactic of deploying analogies as if they are magic spells that automatically win arguments, regardless of whether the analogy actually supports your position.

References

This comic references the ongoing debate about government-mandated encryption backdoors, which gained particular prominence after the 2015-2016 dispute between Apple and the FBI over unlocking a shooter's iPhone. Government officials have argued that law enforcement needs the ability to access encrypted communications, while technologists and privacy advocates counter that any backdoor weakens security for everyone and is inherently abusable.

View History (1) Original Comic
← Previous Comic Next Comic →