moby
Explanation
This comic is about the tension between scientific accuracy and literary greatness, centered on Herman Melville's "Moby-Dick."
Someone asks what the best book is for promoting science, and the answer given is "Moby-Dick, easily." This surprises the other person, leading to a discussion about the book's scientific content. The defender points out that while Melville classified the whale as a fish (which is biologically incorrect -- whales are mammals) and included various inaccuracies about whale biology and behavior, the book's vivid descriptions of whaling were so compelling that they advanced public interest in marine life.
The punchline comes when one character argues that "from Melville's heart, I specifically hate, it doesn't quite have technical accuracy" and the other responds "I think literature and science would prefer technical accuracy" -- the joke being that the passion and literary power of Moby-Dick actually did more to get people interested in whales and ocean science than any technically accurate textbook could.
The humor plays on the irony that a novel famous for getting basic whale taxonomy wrong (Melville's narrator insists a whale is a fish) may have done more for ocean science awareness than rigorously accurate scientific writing. It also satirizes the modern impulse to demand scientific accuracy in all media, suggesting that emotional engagement and narrative power sometimes matter more for science communication than getting every fact right.