Explain SMBC — the wiki for Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal

Science Fictions

2021-01-29 View on smbc-comics.com → 1 revision
You are viewing an older revision of this explanation (2026-03-14 18:13:16). View current version →
Science Fictions
Votey panel for Science Fictions
This explanation is incomplete or may contain errors. It was generated by AI and has not yet been reviewed by a human editor.

Explanation

The Joke

"Science Fictions" is an extended, multi-panel comic presented in the style of a magazine article or long-form essay. It explores various ways that science has been fictionalized, distorted, or misrepresented in public discourse. The comic walks through a series of vignettes showing different characters -- scientists, journalists, politicians, and members of the public -- each contributing to a chain of miscommunication and distortion of scientific findings.

The comic illustrates how a scientific result gets progressively mangled as it moves from the lab to a journal paper, to a press release, to a news article, to social media, and finally to public understanding. At each step, the nuance gets stripped away and the conclusion gets exaggerated or twisted to fit a narrative. The title "Science Fictions" is a double meaning -- both referring to science fiction as a genre and to the fictions (falsehoods) that get created around actual science.

The comic also touches on how politicians and pundits selectively cite scientific findings, how publishing incentives reward sensationalism over accuracy, and how the public is left with a thoroughly distorted picture of what science actually says. By the end, the comic suggests that the entire pipeline from discovery to public understanding is broken in ways that create "fictions" out of genuine science.

The Humor

The humor comes from the escalating absurdity of how a simple, carefully qualified scientific finding gets transformed into something completely unrecognizable by the time it reaches the general public. Each step in the telephone game of science communication is individually plausible and recognizable, which makes the cumulative effect both funny and painfully relatable.

Weinersmith uses the long-form format to build a systematic critique that functions as both comedy and commentary. The deadpan presentation style -- treating each distortion as perfectly normal behavior by the people involved -- highlights how normalized these problems have become. The comic is also self-aware, having originally been published in Nautilus magazine, making it a piece of science communication that is itself about the failures of science communication.

References

  • The comic was originally published in Nautilus magazine, a science and culture publication.
  • The concept of "science fictions" relates to the replication crisis in science, where many published findings have failed to be reproduced.
  • The telephone-game distortion of scientific findings is a well-documented phenomenon in science communication studies.
  • The comic touches on p-hacking, publication bias, and the incentive structures in academic publishing that reward novel and dramatic findings over careful, incremental work.
View History (1) Original Comic