Explain SMBC — the wiki for Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal

Arguments

2015-04-22 View on smbc-comics.com → 1 revision
This explanation is incomplete or may contain errors. It was generated by AI and has not yet been reviewed by a human editor.

Explanation

The Joke

Two people have a heated argument. One makes a good point, and the other — instead of acknowledging it — pivots to a different argument, moves the goalposts, or attacks the person instead of the position. This continues through every logical fallacy in the book, presented as a natural escalation of any human disagreement.

The Humor

The comic is a taxonomy of bad-faith arguing disguised as a conversation. Each panel demonstrates a different logical fallacy or rhetorical trick (ad hominem, strawman, appeal to authority, whataboutism, etc.) in a naturalistic way that makes the reader uncomfortably recognize their own behavior.

The joke is that this pattern is universal: even people who know about logical fallacies commit them constantly in the heat of argument. Knowing the names of the fallacies doesn't make you immune to them.

Context

This comic is frequently shared in online discussions about debate and rhetoric, often ironically (by people committing the exact fallacies the comic describes).

View History (1) Original Comic
← Previous Comic Next Comic →